Nagji Khetsi Cheeda Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 7 Ors. and Popatlal Khetsi (Applicant)

prayer made in Chamber Summons for impleadment of the applicant as party respondent in the Writ Petition has not been opposed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner as according to him parallel proceedings are pending before the Small Causes Court, Mumbai.

¶23

In view of aforesaid, Chamber Summons is allowed. The applicant of the Chamber Summons be impleaded as respondent No.9 in the Writ Petition. Consequential amendment be carried out within one week.

¶24

Chamber Summons stands disposed of.

¶25

List the Writ Petition as per CMIS date.

¶26

( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)

¶27

2/2

Nagji Khetsi Cheeda v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 7 Ors. and Popatlal Khetsi (Applicant)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Nagji Khetsi Cheeda v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 7 Ors. and Popatlal Khetsi (Applicant)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premavathy Subramaniam Vs the State Information Commissioner and 5 Others

Shri Devendra R. Rai Vs Mr. Sudhir S. Mungantiwar and Ors.

Shri. Makarand Ekanath Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Dept of School Education and Sports and Ors.

B.N. Makhija and 4 Ors. Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.

SBI Cards and Payment Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Shree. Dipty Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.