Aristocraft International Private Limited v. Reserve Bank of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought and obtained leave to withdraw Review Petition No. 26 of 2015; the matter was allowed withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
Petitioner sought and obtained leave to withdraw Review Petition No. 26 of 2015; the matter was allowed withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(RPW 26 of 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION No. 26 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION No. 2004 OF 2015
Aristocraft International Private Limited ….Petitioner Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Anr. ….Respondents
***********
Mr.Nimay Dave a/w. Darshan Mehta a/w. Ms. Faiza Dhanani i/b. M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for Petitioner Mr.Mohammadali Chunawala a/w. Mr.P.S. Gujar for Respondent No.2
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 21, 2016 P.C. :
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Aristocraft International Private Limited
Reserve Bank of India
V. M. Kanade
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court