This order condones a 136-day delay in filing a review petition. The High Court dismisses the review, observing no case exists for retrial as the underlying order can be challenged via a special leave petition, which petitioners had already filed.
Notice of motion allowed; review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(NMW 555 of 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 555 OF 2015
IN
REVIEW PETITION (L) No. 56 OF 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION (L) No. 571 OF 2015
Hemlata Venkatesh Prabhu and Ors. ….Applicants
In the matter between
Hemlata Venkatesh Prabhu and Ors. ….Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents
Mr.A.A. Siddiquie i/b. A.A. Siddiquie and Associates for Petitioners Ms. Aparna Murlidharan i/b. Mr.P.G. Lad for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 ***********
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 21, 2016 P.C. :
1/2
(NMW 555 of 2015)
[ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
2/2
Hemlata Venkatesh Prabhu and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
V. M. Kanade
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
