In this review petition concerning a writ regarding Senior Auditor selection criteria, the bench held that the grounds presented did not merit reconsideration and rejected the petition.
The review petition is rejected with no merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpwst5299.15.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 5299 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7248 OF 2013
Shri Shashikant Sampat Mahale ... Applicant
V/s. The Commissioner, Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation & ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Sandip R. Khurkute for the applicant.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ . 28th July, 2016 . (IN CHAMBER)
P.C.
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Government Resolution dated 28th May, 1976 is required to be considered. The petitioner be provided with an opportunity to participate in the selection process of Senior Auditor by relaxing the qualification/experience criteria.
rpwst5299.15.sxw
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Government Resolution dated 28th May, 1976 requires consideration to relax qualification criteria for Senior Auditor selection.
Shri Shashikant Sampat Mahale
The Commissioner, Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation
NARESH H. PATIL
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
