Disposed

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation v. M/S. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC22 Dec 2016RPW/10/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of multiple review petitions filed by the Maharashtra State Financial Corporation. Since the Recovery Appellate Tribunal had maintained earlier orders and an alternative remedy was available regarding the corroboration statement, the Court kept all points open while disposing of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

All review petitions disposed of; points kept open.

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Vs M/S. Hotel… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

dgm 1

¶2

910-rpw-165-16 with group.sxw

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

Review Petn. in WP NO. 165 OF 2016 IN Writ Petition NO. 12721 OF 2016

¶5

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶6

M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

¶7

...Respondent(s)

¶8

WITH Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33071 OF 2016 IN Writ Petition NO. 12724 OF 2016

¶9

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent(s)

¶10

...Respondent(s)

¶11

WITH Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33074 OF 2016 IN

¶12

Writ Petition NO. 12719 OF 2016

¶13

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶14

M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

¶15

...Respondent(s)

¶16

WITH Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33113 OF 2016 IN

¶17

Writ Petition NO. 12726 OF 2016

¶18

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶19

M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

...Respondent(s)

1/4

dgm 2

910-rpw-165-16 with group.sxw

¶24

WITH

¶25

Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33114 OF 2016 IN Writ Petition NO. 12727 OF 2016

¶26

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶27

M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

¶28

...Respondent(s)

¶29

WITH

¶30

Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33115 OF 2016 IN

¶31

Writ Petition NO. 12718 OF 2016

¶32

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶33

M/s Hotel Sahil Pvt. Ltd.

¶34

...Respondent(s)

¶35

WITH Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33116 OF 2016 IN Writ Petition NO. 12720 OF 2016

¶36

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶37

M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

¶38

...Respondent(s)

¶39

WITH Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33121 OF 2016 IN Writ Petition NO. 12722 OF 2016

¶40

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent(s)

¶41

...Respondent(s)

¶42

WITH Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33128 OF 2016 IN

¶43

2/4

¶44

dgm 3

¶45

910-rpw-165-16 with group.sxw

¶46

Writ Petition NO. 12725 OF 2016

¶47

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus M/s. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent(s)

¶48

...Respondent(s)

¶49

WITH Review Petn. in WP (ST) NO. 33131 OF 2016 IN Writ Petition NO. 12723 OF 2016

¶50

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶51

M/s. Hotel Sahil Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent(s)

¶52

AND ALONG WITH

¶53

REVIEW PETITION IN WP (ST) NO. 33078 OF 2016 (NOT ON BOARD) IN

¶54

WRIT PETITION NO. 12717 OF 2016

¶55

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation ...Petitioner(s) Versus

¶56

M/s. Hotel Sahil Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent(s)

¶57

Dr. Arun Kumar Barthakur for the Review Petitioners (Original Respondents) in all matters.

¶58

Ms. Jyoti Chavan for respondents (Original Petitioners) in all matters.

¶59

CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

¶60

DATE : December 22, 2016

¶61

ORDER:

¶62

In continuation of earlier orders, the statement is made by

¶63

the counsel appearing for the parties that the Registrar, Debts

¶64

3/4

¶65

dgm 4 910-rpw-165-16 with group.sxw

¶66

Recovery Appellate Tribunal, on an Application/Representation filed by Petitioners, has taken decision and maintained the earlier order. The original Petitioner, even if aggrieved by the same, the alternateive remedy is available. In view of this, by keeping all points open, we are disposing of all these Review Petitions.

¶67

2 No costs.

¶68

(A. S. GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)

¶69

4/4

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation v. M/S. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation v. M/S. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Jewel Tech (I) Ltd. and 2 Ors. Vs State Bank of India

Utility Paper Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Rekha Ruia Vs Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Ors.

State Bank of India Vs State of Maharashtra, through Revenue Officer and Ors.

Union of India Thru Secretary Ministry of Shipping and Anr. Vs J.K. Dhar and Anr.

Ajit Subhash Mande and Anr. Vs Bank of Maharashtra and Ors.

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Vs M/S. Hotel Mayfair Pvt. Ltd.