Disposed
M/S. Jewel Tech (I) Ltd. and 2 Ors. v. State Bank of India
Bombay HCWP/17/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Nalawade IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 /1 WP NO.2259-16
Nalawade
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITON (L) NO.2259 OF 2016
M/s. Jewel Tech(I) Ltd. and ors.
...Petitioners.
vs.
State Bank of India.
...Respondents.
Mr. Shashikant C. Gaikwad for the Petitioners. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.S. GADKARI, JJ. DATE : 21st December, 2016
ORDER:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. It is disposed off accordingly. No costs.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
M/s. Jewel Tech(I) Ltd.
State Bank of India
Anoop V. Mohta
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court