Bhagwat J. Pandit and 3 Ors. v. Mun.Corpn.of Gr.Bombay and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition rejected by Bombay High Court as no error apparent on face of record and no ground for review found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
revptn-10.16
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.10 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.871 OF 1996
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Prashant P. Chavan along with Shri Ravindra R. Chile i/b Ms. Sheila Kanungo for the Petitioners.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 9TH AUGUST 2016
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Review Petitioner. There is no error apparent on the face of record. Even otherwise, there is no ground for review. The Review Petition is rejected.
(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Petitioners
Respondent(s)
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court