The High Court of Bombay disposed of an appeal based on consent terms tendered and signed by both parties and their advocates. The court accepted undertakings incorporated in the terms.
The Appeal stood disposed of in terms of the consent marked; the pending Notice of Motion was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ash
appeal-697.14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.697 OF 2014 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.25 OF 2014 IN MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.80 OF 2013
Kiran Manohar Chhabria. .. Appellant Vs Kishore Rajaram Chhabria. .. Respondent
Ms. Nikita Vardhan i/b Kanga & Co for the Appellant. Ms. Lara Jesani i/b M. Mulla Associates for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 9TH AUGUST 2016
P.C.
ash
appeal-697.14
2
ORDER :
Kiran Manohar Chhabria
Kishore Rajaram Chhabria
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
