This court disposed of a public interest litigation filed by the petitioner as infructuous without recording any detailed reasons or substantive findings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YBG
1
21-pil-216-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L.NO.216 OF 2014
Sadashiv Dinkarrao Nimbalkar .. Petitioner
Mr. Ravi Girish Shinde for petitioner Ms. Aparna Vhatkar AGP for State.
CORAM : V.M.KANADE & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ DATE : 7th October 2016.
P.C.
1] Learned Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits
that the PIL has become infructuous. It is accordingly disposed of.
(MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J) (V.M.KANADE, J)
Sadashiv Dinkarrao Nimbalkar
The Govt. of Maharashtra
V.M. Kanade
Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
