Deepak Pradhan v. Shri Suresh P. Patel and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay became infructuous due to the efflux of time and was disposed of without further ado.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
YBG
1
5-pillod-22035-15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. LOD. NO.22035 OF 2015
Depak Pradhan .. Petitioner - Versus - Suresh P Patel ..Respondent
Mr. A.A.Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate with Kunal Bhanage for petitioner Mr. Shrishailya Deshmukh for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : V.M.KANADE & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ DATE : 7th October 2016.
P.C.
1] We are informed that by efflux of time the P.I.L. has become
infructuous. It is accordingly disposed of.
(MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J) (V.M.KANADE, J)
Depak Pradhan
Suresh P Patel
V.M. Kanade
Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court