A two-judge bench recalled a Prothonotary order dismissing a review petition due to non-removal of office objections and restored the petition to the file for appropriate Bench hearing.
Notice of motion allowed and disposed of as prayed; review petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(NMW 416 of 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No.416 OF 2015
IN REVIEW PETITION (L) No.26 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION No. 121 OF 2015
Poonam Chambers “B” Wing Commercial Premises Co-op. Soc. Ltd. ….Applicant/ Petitioner
Vs.
The States of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents
Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh for Applicant/Petitioner Mr.J.S. Saluja _AGP for Respondent -State ***********
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 21, 2016
P.C. :
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Poonam Chambers “B” Wing Commercial Premises Co-op. Soc. Ltd.
The States of Maharashtra and Ors.
V. M. KANADE
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
