Single judge disposed of a Notice of Motion seeking interim relief by dismissing it after indicating non-inclination to grant any ad-interim order in the pending writ petition.
Notice of Motion No. 361 of 2016 dismissed, with no interim relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (LODGING) NO.361 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1118 OF 2016
Krishnamrutam Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai
V/s.
Union of India & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Bipin Kumar Darad for the Applicant.
Mr. Neel G. Helekar, a/w. Mr. Atul S. Singh, for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.
DATE : 4 TH MAY, 2016.
P.C. :
to grant any ad-interim order. Yet, a Notice of Motion is moved seeking
interim relief.
3. The Petition is yet to be admitted. We have merely issued notice to
the Respondents and the Respondents are yet to be served. Once we
have indicated that we are not inclined to grant any ad-interim relief, then,
1/2
NMWL-361-16.doc
interfering with the order of suspension and staying its effect would amount to granting final relief in the Writ Petition, we decline this Notice of
Motion and the same is dismissed.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
2/2
NMWL-361-16.doc
Krishnamrutam Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
SC DHARMADHIKARI
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
