Disposed
Rugmani Raghavan v. B.M.C.and Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/112/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Notice of motion in writ petition expedited for final hearing. Order disposed of without substantive merits.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 112 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2609 OF 2002
¶3
Mrs. Rugmani Raghavan. ..Petitioner.
¶4
Versus
¶5
BMC and Others.
¶6
..Respondents.
¶7
Ms. Yasmin Panchal i/b M/s M P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner.
¶8
Coram : Ranjit More & Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, JJ. Date : March 21, 2016 .
¶9
P. C. :
¶10
- For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of notice of motion, hearing of the above writ petition is expedited. Place the writ petition on final hearing board in the week commencing from 25th April 2016.
¶11
- Notice of motion stands disposed of.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rugmani Raghavan
- respondent
BMC and Others
Coram
AI extract
Ranjit More
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Saroj Verma Vs Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board and 7 Others
Milind Balwantrao Chavan and Ors. Vs Shahupuri Grampanchayat
Mahatma Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through Its Chairman and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, School Edu. Dept. and Anr.
Shri. Anand Joshi and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Ors.