This court disposed of a contempt petition where the respondents undertook to complete a pending inquiry within one month, thereby redressing the petitioner's grievance regarding withheld document copies sought under RTI applications.
Undertaking accepted to complete inquiry within one month; Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.22 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1077 OF 2015
Dr. Saroj Verma .… Petitioner V/s. Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board, Churchgate, Mumbai & Ors. …. Respondents / Contemnors And The Mumbai University, Mumbai …. Respondent
Mr. S.K. Nair, i/by Mr. S.C. Kabra, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Harsh Behany, i/by M/s. Maniar Srivastav & Associates, for Respondent Nos.1 to 6.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.
DATE : 18TH MARCH 2016.
P.C. :
1/2
CONPW-22-16.doc
respectively, for getting copies of certain documents. However, Respondents have not given copies of the documents sought under the said applications. We, therefore, direct the Enquiry Officer to take appropriate decision on the Petitioner's applications.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
2/2
CONPW-22-16.doc
Dr. Saroj Verma
Hyderabad (Sind) National Collegiate Board
Mumbai University
Ranjit More
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
