Malcolm Rustomji Printer v. Khurshed Rustomji Printer (Caveator)
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913-NMT41-16.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 41 OF 2016
IN
CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 159 OF 2015 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 410 OF 2007
Khurshed Rustomji Printer…Applicant
In the matter between
Malcolm Rustomji Printer...Petitioner
Versus
Khurshed Rustomji Printer…Respondent
Mr. Atul Thakkar, i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vasim Siddiqui, for the Applicant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 30th March 2016
PC:-
1.For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support, and
despite the energetic opposition from the Petitioner, the Notice of
Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
2.Office objections are to be removed on or before 11th April
2016. The Applicant shall pay costs quantified at Rs. 1,000/- to the
1 of 2
913-NMT41-16.DOC
Advocate for the Petitioner as a condition precedent. If the
objections are not removed by that date, the matter shall stand
dismissed without further reference to the Court and will not be
restored thereafter, even on payment of costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Khurshed Rustomji Printer
Malcolm Rustomji Printer
Khurshed Rustomji Printer
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court