The petitioners instructed not to press the Notice of Motion in a notice of motion and suit bearing numbers 2458/2012 and 2012/2012 respectively. The court dismissed the Notice of Motion as withdrawn.
Notice of Motion dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-NMS-2458-2012.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2458 OF 2012
IN
SUIT NO.2012 OF 2012
Whirlpool of India Limited…Plaintiff
Versus
Videocon Industries Limited…Defendant
Mr. Rashmin Khandekar, with Hemant Thadhani with Janhvi
Chadha & Minesh Andharia, i/b M/s Krishna & Saurashtri, for
the Plaintiff.
Mr. D.D. Madon, Senior Advocate,with Mr. Atul Daga, Mr. Suraj
Iyer, i/b Ganesh & Co. for Defendant No.9.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:29th June 2016
PC:-
1.The matter was argued for some time yesterday. It remained
part-heard. Today, Mr. Khandekar for the Contempt Petitioners,
says he now has instructions not to press the Notice of Motion.
2.The Notice of Motion is dismissed as withdrawn with no
order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
29 June 2016
Whirlpool of India Limited
Videocon Industries Limited
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court