Disposed

Siddhi Vinayak Knots and Prints Private Limited v. E-Bay India Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Other

Bombay HC28 Jun 2016NMS/196/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Defendant Nos. 1 and 2, alleging no cause of action, sought deletion from the infring suit. The court allowed the motion, directed ex parte defendants to supply infringer details, and ordered amendment of pleadings.

What did the court decide?

Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 deleted as party-defendants; directed to supply info by 8/7/2016; amended plaint due by 15/7/2016.

Siddhi Vinayak Knots and Prints Private Limited Vs E-Bay… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

914-NMS196-16.DOC

¶2

ATUL

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 196 OF 2016

¶4

IN

¶5

SUIT NO. 164 OF 2016

¶6

Siddhi Vinayak Knots & Prints Private Limited…Plaintiff
Versus
E-Bay India Private Limited & 2 Others…Defendants

¶7

Mr. Bhushan Mahadik, for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Padmaja Dholakia, i/b Dholakia Law Associates, for the
Defendants.

¶8

CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:28th June 2016

¶9

PC:-

¶10

1. Heard.

¶11

2.This is a Notice of Motion by Defendants Nos. 1 and 2, E-Bay
India Private Limited and its Managing Director, seeking to be
deleted as party-Defendants to the Suit. Ms. Dholakia for these
Defendants states that there is no cause of action disclosed against
them. Prima facie, she is correct. The infringement is by the 3rd
Defendant.

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

28th June 2016

¶14

914-NMS196-16.DOC

¶15

3.On behalf of the Plaintiff, it is stated that the Plaintiff does
not know the contact details of the infringers or offenders and the
3rd Defendant. This information is available with the 1st Defendant,
through whom the Defendant No. 3 has been selling infringing
products.

¶16

4.On behalf of the Defendants, Ms. Dholakia agrees that the 1st
and 2nd Defendants, on request from the Plaintiff’s Advocates, will
disclose to them such contact information as is available with the 1st
Defendant in its records. That statement is accepted.

¶17

5.In view thereof, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in
these terms. Defendants Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to be deleted as
party-Defendants to the Suit. The 1st and 2nd Defendants will
supply the necessary information on or before 8th July 2016.

¶18

6.Amendments deleting the names of the 1st and 2nd
Defendants and incorporating the correct address of the 3rd
Defendant to be carried out, without need of re-verification, on or
before 15th July 2016. A copy of the amended plaint be served on
the Advocate for the sole remaining Defendant within two weeks
thereafter.

¶19

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶20

Page 2 of 2
28th June 2016

Siddhi Vinayak Knots and Prints Private Limited v. E-Bay India Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siddhi Vinayak Knots and Prints Private Limited v. E-Bay India Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Vs Queen Cosmetic Co.

Neon Laboratories Ltd. Vs East West Pharma and Anr.

Neon Laboratories Ltd. Vs East West Pharma and Anr.

Minaxi Kishore Mehta Vs Kiron D. Sanghavi through his C.A. Sunil Dalal

Siddhi Vinayak Knots and Prints Private Limited Vs E-Bay India Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Others

Ctr Manufacturing Industries Ltd. Vs Sergi Transformer Explosion Prevention Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Ors.