Allowed
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Queen Cosmetic Co.
Bombay HCLPETN/144/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
906-LPETN144-16.DOC
¶2
ATUL
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAVE PETITION NO. 144 OF 2016
¶4
IN
¶5
SUIT (L) NO. 2 OF 2016
¶6
Hindustan Unilever Limited…Plaintiff
Versus
Queen Cosmetic Company…Defendant
¶7
Mr. Ashutosh Kane, i/b W.S. Kane & Co., for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Karishma Shirke, i/b Gordhandas & Fozdar, for the Defendant.
¶8
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:27th June 2016
¶9
PC:-
¶10
1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
¶11
2. The Petition has been served. By consent, the Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Hindustan Unilever Limited
- respondent
Queen Cosmetic Company
Coram
AI extract
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court