The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of a Notice of Motion filed with respect to Suit No. 1018 of 2014 as infructuous upon the representation that no further orders were necessary.
Notice of Motion disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
922-NMS1440-16.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1440 OF 2016
IN
SUIT NO. 1018 OF 2014
CTP Environment S.A.S.
Versus
Sentro Technologies Limited & Another
…Plaintiffs
…Defendants
Mr. Viraag Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Aditya
Thakkar, Mr. Adheesh Nargolkar & Ms. Smriti Yadav, i/b
Khaitan & Co., for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. Kamal Khata, with Ms. Deepali Sharma, i/b Win Law Group, for
the Defendants.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:12th July 2016
PC:-
1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
2.Mr. Tulzapurkar says that this Notice of Motion will not
survive as no further orders are necessary. The Notice of Motion is
disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs.
3. The earlier orders will continue.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
12th July 2016
CTP Environment S.A.S.
Sentro Technologies Limited
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court