The High Court of Bombay dismissed the suit as withdrawn at the plaintiff's request on 11th July 2016. No order as to costs was passed.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn. Court fee refunded per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
203-S2745-00.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2745 OF 2000
Sony Kabushiki Kaisha
Versus
Rasik K. Gada
…Plaintiff
…Defendant
Mr. Jagganathan, i/b Juris Parmar Chambers, for the Plaintiff.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:11th July 2016
PC:-
1. At the request of the learned Advocate for the Plaintiff, the Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
2. Refund of court fee, if any, in accordance with the Rules.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
11th July 2016
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court