The High Court of Bombay disposed of a Notice of Motion in an insolvency proceeding where the parties had entered into Consent Terms. The court recorded the terms and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Notice of Motion disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
92-NMIS13-16.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS INSOLVENCY JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 13 OF 2016
IN
INSOLVENCY NOTICE NO. N/28 OF 2015
Draavya Enterprises…Judgment Creditor
Versus
Firoze A. Nadiadwala…Judgment Debtor
Mr. Keegan Almeida, i/b Kanga & Co., for the Judgment Creditor.
Mr. Ashok Bhatia, with Mr. Tripathi, for Mr. Arif Bookwala, for the
Judgment Debtor.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 15th March 2016
PC:-
1.The Judgment Debtor and Judgment Creditor have entered
into Consent Terms. They have tendered these Consent Terms.
The Consent Terms set out the agreement between the parties.
They are signed by the Judgment Debtor and on behalf of the
Creditor and by their respective Advocates. The signatories are
present in Court. I am satisfied that the Consent Terms are entered
into by the parties on their own volition. The Consent Terms are
taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
1 of 2
92-NMIS13-16.DOC
2. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in terms of these Consent Terms.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Draavya Enterprises
Firoze A. Nadiadwala
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court