On an instruction stating the applicant did not wish to press the Notice of Motion in Appeal No. 418 of 2015, the Bombay High Court disposed of the application as not pressed with no substantive legal finding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17_nma_418_2015.doc
Megha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION (APPEALS) NO.418 OF 2015 IN APPEAL NO.622 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.281 OF 2008 Irfankhan Chotekhan ...Applicant In the matter between Irfankhan Chotekhan ...Applicant
Versus
Abdul Mannan Chotekhan & Ors. ...Respondents
...
Mr. S.B. Prabhavalkar with Mr. Nilesh S. Parte for the Applicant. Ms Achala Hatode i/b. M/s. S.K. Jain and Associates for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Manish Bohra i/b. M/s. Dahibawkar and Co. for Respondent Nos.2(d), (e) and (f).
Mr. A.H. Khatri i/b. Khatri Legal Venture for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 29th NOVEMBER, 2016.
P. C. :
The learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions says
that the Applicant does not want to press this notice of motion. Accordingly, same is disposed of as not pressed.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
1/1
Irfankhan Chotekhan
Abdul Mannan Chotekhan & Ors.
A.S. OKA
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court