Notice of Motion in appeal admitted by the High Court of Bombay was dismissed for non-prosecution as none appeared for the applicant in either session.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nma38
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.38 OF 2016 IN
APPEAL (L) NO.476 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Applicant
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.D.NAIK,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 28, 2016
P.C.
1None appeared for the applicant in
the morning session. Even in the
afternoon session, none appears for the
applicant. Hence, we dismiss the
Notice of Motion for non prosecution.
(P.D.NAIK,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
The Applicant
The Respondent
A.S.OKA
P.D.NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court