Disposed
Bombay Forgings Ltd. v. Manilal and Son
Bombay HCAPP/429/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
579.15 os.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What did the court decide?
Interim relief extended by one month with a direction that no further extension will be granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
k
¶2
1/1
¶3
pro 903 appl 579.15 os.doc
¶4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶5
APPEAL (L) NO.579 OF 2015
¶6
Bombay Forging Limited ….. Appellant V/s
¶7
M/s. Manilal & Son ….. Respondent
¶8
Mr. Aditya Khandeparkar a/w Ms. Sukhda Wagle i/b M/s. Hariani & Co. for the Appellant.
¶9
Dr. Birendra Saraf a/w Mr. Murtuza Federal & Ms. Hiral Thakkar i/b M/s. Federal & Rashmikant for Respondents.
¶10
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
¶11
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
¶12
DATED : 14 JUNE 2016
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Bombay Forging Limited
- respondent
M/s. Manilal & Son
Coram
AI extract
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court