The High Court of Bombay severed a Notice of Motion, condoned a delay in filing, recalled an order dismissing an appeal for want of prosecution, and restored the appeal to the file for disposal on merits.
Appeal restored; impugned order recalled; four weeks time granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
NMA 2357 of 2016
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 2357 OF 2016 IN APPEAL (L) No. 214 OF 2012 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1243 OF 2012 IN SUIT No. 1055 OF 2011
Manubai @ Motibai Niklaw Vaity and Ors. ….Applicants
In the matter between
Smt. Manubhai @ Motibai Niklaw Vaity and Ors. ….Appellants Vs.
Anil R. Agarwal and Anr. ….Respondents
Sean Wassoodew a/w. Rupesh Manohare a/w. Vijaya S. Ingale for Applicants/Appellants
Mr. Subir Chakrabarti I/b. Vidhi Partners for Respondent No.1 Ms. Parna Deokar for Respondent No.2
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : OCTOBER 17, 2016
P.C. :
appeal for want of prosecution by the Prothonotary & Senior Master ,
High Court, Bombay is recalled. Appeal is restored to the file. Notice
2/2
NMA 2357 of 2016
of Motion No. 2357 of 2016 is accordingly allowed and disposed of in
terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b)
Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone delay in filing Notice of Motion and recall impugned order dismissing appeal for want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Manubhai @ Motibai Niklaw Vaity and Ors.
Anil R. Agarwal
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
