Disposed
Satguru Corporate Services Pvt.Ltd and Anr. v. Shrilekha Somani and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCNMA/235/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
nma-235-237.16
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.235 OF 2016 IN
APPEAL (L) NO.441 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.224 OF 2014 IN SUIT NO. 156 OF 2014 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.236 OF 2016 IN APPEAL (L) NO.440 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.228 OF 2014 IN SUIT NO. 161 OF 2014 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.237 OF 2016 IN APPEAL (L) NO.444 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.225 OF 2014 IN SUIT NO. 150 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Tanvi Shah along with Shri Deepa Jojo i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co for the Applicant in all the Notices of Motion.
Shri S. Jain, Shri Rushabh Jharkar and Ms. J. Jaiswal i/b Shri Yashpal Jain for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 22ND JULY 2016
2nma-235-237.16
ash
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and the learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent who is the only contesting party. Though the Appeals have been admitted, delay of two days was not formally condoned. Accordingly, we make the Notices of Motion absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court