Constitution Bench petition regarding alleged breach of a liberty granted in a prior order allowing the petitioner to file proceedings against a Developer for failure to complete a project or provide alternate accommodation.
Petition disposed of; liberty to file proceedings under Clause 7 kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cp-44.15
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.44 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Manoti Kiran Koli, the Petitioner in person.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 22ND JULY 2016
P.C.:
. Heard the Petitioner appearing in person. The breach alleged is of Clause 7 of the judgment and order dated 17th April 2012 passed by a Division Bench of this Court. The Division Bench of this Court by the said judgment and order dismissed the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 24th January 2012 by which a Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner was dismissed. Under Clause 7 of the judgment and order dated 17th April 2012, a liberty has been granted to the Petitioner to file appropriate proceedings if the Respondent No.4 Developer does not complete the project and does not offer the Appellant permanent alternate accommodation by 30th April 2014.
2
cp-44.15
ash
(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Ms. Manoti Kiran Koli
Respondent No. 4 Developer
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court