This is a notice of motion concerning a review petition where the application filed in person was heard. The court condoned the procedural delay and disposed of the notice of motion without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
NMA/9/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.9 OF 2016 IN REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.59 OF 2015 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1219 OF 2015 IN APPEAL NO.787 OF 2003 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2078 OF 2000 IN SUIT NO.606 OF 2000
Pramila Suman Singh
…..Applicant
In the matter between
Pramila Suman Singh
…..Petitioner
V/s
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Others
….. Respondents.
Ms. Pramila S. Thakur, Applicant in person present.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE: 29th February, 2016
P.C.:-
Heard the applicant who is appearing in person. None appears on behalf of the respondents, though they are
2/2
NMA/9/2016
served. Delay of 8 days in filing the Review Petition is condoned for the reasons stated in affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. Notice of Motion is disposed of.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
bdpps
Pramila Suman Singh
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
