Petitioners confirmed receipt of funds and sought withdrawal of the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn; consequent notice of motion disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-MPT50-16.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 50 OF 2016
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 851 OF 2014 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 192 OF 2016
S P Mistry & 3 Others…Petitioners
Versus
Sherene Neville Vakil & Another…Respondents
Ms. Pallavi Bali , i/b M/s. Bali Associate, for the Petitioners.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 29th November 2016
PC:-
1. The Petitioners confirm that they have received an amount of Rs. 10,87,06,657/-. They seek leave to withdraw the Miscellaneous Petition. The Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. In view thereof, the Notice of Motion does not survive and is disposed of as infructuous.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
29th November 2016
S P Mistry & 3 Others
Sherene Neville Vakil & Another
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court