Disposed
Shri Ramlal Choithram Moorjani v. Shri Shyam Choithram Moorjani
Bombay HCNMT/188/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
51-NMT-188-2012.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 188 OF 2012
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 92 OF 2009
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 796 OF 2007
…Plaintiff
Ramlal Choithram Moorjani…Plaintiff
Versus
Shyam Choithram Moorjani…Defendant
None for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Hariram Udayav, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 28th November 2016
PC:-
1. Mr. A.H. Shah, the previous Commissioner passed away.
2.By consent, Mr. Bhupesh Dhumatkar is appointed
Commissioner. The parties will proceed on the basis of the copies of
the notes of evidence in their possession. The usual directions will
operate:
(a) The Commissioner is at liberty to exercise discretion under Order XVIII Rule 4(4) of the Code of CivilPage 1 of 3
28th November 2016
51-NMT-188-2012.DOC
Procedure, 1908, to note the demeanour of the
witnesses where necessary.
(b) Further examination-in-chief of the witness is to be permitted before the Commissioner before crossexamination commences.(c) All further examination-in-chief and cross-examination shall be taken strictly in question and answer form.(d) The Commissioner will also be at liberty to direct that the whole or any part of the cross-examination should be video recorded for later reference of the court. Should that be done, the original audio visual recording will be submitted along with the Commissioner’s Report to the Registry.(e) All re-examination will be conducted only in court.(f) Costs of the commission shall be borne as has been done in the past.(g) The Commissioner is not to permit any applications for adjournment on dates previously fixed, except where absolutely unavoidable. Counsel’s inconvenience or unavailability does not constitute such unavoidability.(h) Liberty to the parties as also to the Commissioner to apply in case of difficulty.3. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in these terms. All other issues will be taken up on the next date.
Page 2 of 3
28th November 2016
51-NMT-188-2012.DOC
4. List the matter for directions on 13th January 2017.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 3 of 3
28th November 2016
Ramlal Choithram Moorjani
Shyam Choithram Moorjani
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court