In an Absentia proceeding, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Miscellaneous Petition No. 41 of 2014 for non-prosecution as the petitioner and their advocates were not present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
925-MPT-41-2014.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.41 OF 2014
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.399 OF 1977
Sanjay Ramesh Kale & 4 Others…Petitioners
Versus
Bhagirathi Chandrashekhar Kale & others… Respondents
Mr. Omprakash Pandey, i/b M/s. Pandey and Company for the Petitioners.Mr. A.C. Mahimkar, for the Caveator.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 2nd September 2016
PC:-
1.The Petitioner and their Advocates are absent. The names are
called out. The names of the Petitioner and their Advocates are
correctly shown on the supplementary board.
2.The matter is listed at Sr. No.925. None appears for the
Petitioners.
3.Miscellaneous Petition No.41 of 2014 is dismissed for non
prosecution.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
2nd September 2016
Sanjay Ramesh Kale & 4 Others
Bhagirathi Chandrashekhar Kale & others
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court