Single-judge ordergranting leave petition to convert notice of motion into interim order in a consumer dispute. No substantive issues framed or legal principles discussed in this brief order.
Leave petition made absolute; interim order made in terms of prayer clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-NMSL2344-16.DOC
SHEPHALI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2344 OF 2016
IN
SUIT (L) NO. 816 OF 2016 WITH
LEAVE PETITION NO. 227 OF 2016
Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
Versus
Romika Industries
…Plaintiffs
…Defendants
Mr. Nikhil Sharma, a/w Ms. Ashwini Khalapurkar, i/b W. S. Kane &
Co., for the Plaintiffs.
Mrs. Kavita Ambekar, IInd Assistant to Court Receiver, present.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 1st September 2016
PC:-
1.The Receiver has executed the commission in accordance
with the order dated 9th August 2016. There is a report that is
placed. It shows that substantial quantity of goods with the
offending mark were found. The Defendants have been served.
There is an Affidavit of Service dated 29th August 2016. The
Affidavit is taken on file. Despite service, none appears for the
Defendants.
Page 1 of 2
1st September 2016
903-NMSL2344-16.DOC
2. For the reasons set out in the Petition for leave under Clause XIV of the Letters Patent, it is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
3. Now that leave has been granted, there will be, in addition to the previous ad-interim order, which is to continue as a final order on this Notice of Motion, an interim order in terms of prayer clause (b).
4. The Notice of Motion is disposed of in these terms. There will be no order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1st September 2016
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court