High Court allowed the application restoring the appeal to the file without substantive reasoning detailed in the text.
Application allowed; Appeal restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9.12MCA.214.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
M.C.A. NO. 214 OF 2016 IN F.C.A. NO. 93 OF 2014. (Pramod Laxman Jambulkar .vs. Sarojini Pramod Jambulkar)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 9, 2016.
None for the respondents.
For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. The Appeal is restored to file.
Judge
Judge
J.
Pramod Laxman Jambulkar
Sarojini Pramod Jambulkar
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
