This single-paragraph order records the deletion of respondent no.7 at the request of counsel and disposes of the pending application without further discussion or reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 109 OF 2014
IN
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 190 OF 2012
MR. RAMESH SUKDOW BHANDARI AND 6 ORS.,
... Applicants
Versus
GANGADHAR MORTO NAIK GAONKAR (SIN. DEC.) REP. BY LR'S. AND 6 ORS.,
... Respondents
Mr. Ryan Da Piedade Menezes, Adv.for the applicants.
Coram:K. L. WADANE, J.
Date:28th January, 2016
P.C.
Learned Advocate appearing for the applicants states that name of respondent no.7 be deleted in this matter and connected matters.
Name of respondent no.7 is deleted at the request of learned counsel for the applicants.
Application stands disposed of.
K. L. WADANE, J.
mukund
MR. RAMESH SUKDOW BHANDARI AND 6 ORS.
GANGADHAR MORTO NAIK GAONKAR...
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
