Civil Application filed in connection with a Second Appeal was dismissed as the applicant's counsel was consistently absent and the applicant was found undiligent in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2015
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2013
SHRI CHANDRAKANT APA MANGAONKAR. Versus SHRI ATMARAM KRISHNA PALIEKAR AND 9 ORS.,
... Applicant
... Respondents
Mr. P. Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Coram:K. L. WADANE, J.
Date:22nd January, 2016
P.C.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant is absent.
K. L. WADANE, J.
arp/*
CHANDRAKANT APA MANGAONKAR
ATMARAM KRISHNA PALIEKAR
K. L. Wade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
