Review petition against a writ petition accepted requirement. Court found no error apparent on face of record warranting review application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mca1044.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Misc. Civil Application No.1044/2016 (For Review) in Writ Petition No.5897/2016 (D)
Ravindra Ganpat Jadhav ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra, thr. Secretary, Deptt. Of Law and Judiciary.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2016
Heard.
No error is apparent on the face of record warranting invoking review jurisdiction of this Court. The Misc. Civil Application is, therefore, rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
kahale
Ravindra Ganpat Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
