The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench disposed of a contempt petition where the respondent had complied with the impugned order and tendered an unconditional apology, finding no need to proceed further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp377.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
Contempt Petition No.377/2016 in Writ Petition No.3244/2011
Ansar Ahmed Khan s/o Sabir Khan and Ors. ..vs.. Shri Prakash Mukund, the Education Officer (Secondary), Z. P. Akola.
Mr. R. J. Mirza, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Rao, A.G.P. for respondent-State.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2016
The order of which contempt is alleged, has been complied with. The respondent no.1 is personally present in the Court. He has tendered is unconditional apology.
In that view of the matter, we do not find it necessary to proceed further in the matter.
The contempt petition is disposed of as such.
JUDGE
JUDGE
kahale
Ansar Ahmed Khan s/o Sabir Khan and Ors.
Shri Prakash Mukund
B. R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
