The suit for infringement and passing off was disposed of in accordance with consent terms drawn up and signed by representatives of both parties and their advocates, with no decree drawn up.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-S1131-15.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1131 OF 2015
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2265 OF 2015
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited…Plaintiff
Versus
S Kant Healthcare Limited…Defendant
Mr. Mahesh Mahadgut, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. C.M. Lokeshappa, for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J. DATED: 16th March 2016
PC:-
1.The Suit for infringement and passing off is settled. Consent
Terms have been drawn up. They are signed on behalf of the
Plaintiff by the Deputy General Manager – Legal, Ms. Archana M.
Bene and on behalf of the Defendant by one Mr. Nishit Shah, Vice
President, International Marketing. They are also signed by the
Advocates for the parties. The Consent Terms are taken on record
and marked “X” for identification. The undertakings in the
Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.
1 of 2
901-S1131-15.DOC
2.Being satisfied that these Consent Terms are fair, just and
legal and not barred by any provisions of law or vitiated on any
ground, the Suit is disposed of in accordance with the Consent
Terms.
3.Refund of court fee, if any, in accordance with the Rules.
Drawn up decree dispensed with.
4. In view of disposal of the Suit, nothing survives in the Notice of Motion and the same is disposed of accordingly.
5. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court