Disposed

Sanya Sud v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC8 Aug 2016IPA/39/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the Bombay High Court disposed of the matter by granting the Petitioner liberty to file a fresh application for a water connection within a week, directing the Corporation to decide it within two weeks of receipt.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a fresh application for water connection within one week; Corporation directed to act within two weeks.

Sanya Sud Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

prod-905-wpl-1573-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1573 OF 2016 WITH

¶4

IN PERSON APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2016

Ms. Sanya Sud

...Petitioner

vs.

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another ...Respondents

¶9

Ms. Deepa Pohuja, for the Petitioner Ms. Geeta Joglekar, for the Respondent-BMC. Mr. R.J. Mane, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Goldie Sud, Respondent No. 2 in person present.

¶10

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.

¶11

DATE : AUGUST 08, 2016

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.

¶14

Parties through their counsel.

¶15

3. By filing this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

¶16

of India, the Petitioner has claimed the following reliefs:

¶17

“(a) To direct the Respondent No. 1 to transfer the water connection at CCN No. HW@0212740, AMR Meter No. 8806807 at Flat No. 3 Meleagrina 494, Linking Road, Bandra (w), Mumbai from the name of the Respondent No. 2 to that of the Petitioner in the name of the Petitioner.”

¶18

1/2

¶19

Vishal Parekar

¶20

prod-905-wpl-1573-2016

¶21

(b) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Petition, to direct the Respondent No. 1 to not disconnect the water connection at CCN No. HW@0212740, AMR Meter No. 8806807 at Flat No. 3, Meleagrina 494, Linking Road, Bandra(w), Mumbai in the interest of justice.”

¶22

Having considered the submissions made by the learned

¶23

counsel for the parties and having gone through the reply and the stand taken by the Corporation, we are of the view that this Petition deserves to be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh application for grant of water connection for the flat in question. On receipt of such application, the Competent Authority of the Municipal Corporation shall consider the same and appropriate order on it be passed in accordance with law as early as possible but not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of such application. The Petitioner to submit the application within a week.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid, the Petition as also the pending applications stand disposed of.

¶25

(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

¶26

2/2

¶27

Vishal Parekar

Sanya Sud v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanya Sud v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Prakash Ramchandra Kamble and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Dr. V.S. Mhaskar Vs Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Smt. Ashvini Ramchandra Bhogam Alias Mr. Ashvini Amer Ramane Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Manoj Gunwant Soni and 3 Others Vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay

Manoj Gunwant Soni and 3 Others Vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and 2 Ors.

The Kranti Shetkari Sang Vs the State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary and Ors.