Neeta Nitin Popat v. ..............................................
Bombay HCGP/9/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
7-GP-9-2012.DOC
¶2
JSN
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO.9 OF 2012
¶4
Neeta Nitin Popat
¶5
…Petitioner
¶6
Mr. Sanjiv Singh, for the Petitioner.
¶7
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:20th April 2016
¶8
PC:-
¶9
1.At the request of Advocate for the Petitioner, the Petition is
allowed to be withdrawn. No order as to costs.
¶10
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
¶11
1 of 1
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court