Disposed
1. Roma Madan Bahl and Anr. v. Ratu Sitaldas Ramchandani
Bombay HCTS/76/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-TS-76-2015.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.76 OF 2015
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.803 OF 2013
WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.148 OF 2015
Roma Madan Bahl & Anr.…Plaintiffs
Versus
Ratu Sitaldas Ramchandani…Defendant
Ms.Megha Chandra, i/b. Sunil & Co. for the Caveator.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 18th April 2016
PC:-
1.At the request of the learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs, the
Testamentary Suit and Testamentary Petition are allowed to be
withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings. Refund of
Court Fees, if any, as per Rules.
2.In view thereof, the Chamber Summons does not survive and
is disposed of accordingly.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court