The High Court in a family appeal noted the appellant husband's willingness to resume marital life. The bench decided to interview both parties before proceeding further and restored the matter to their file for the specified hearing date.
Parties directed to be interviewed. Appeal matter restored to file for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
FCA188/15
BDPPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.188 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.188 OF 2015
Balanand Suryanarayan Jha
…. Appellant.
V/s
Sheela Balanand Jha
….. Respondent.
Mr. Niranjan A Mogre a/w Mr. Ravi Shinde and Sujay Gangal for the Appellant. Mr. Ratheshwar Jha for the Respondent.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE & MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE: 6th October, 2016
P.C.:-
2/2
FCA188/15
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the maintenance order should be dismissed or remanded for interview.
Whether the maintenance order should be set aside given the husband's willingness to take the wife back.
Whether the writ petition challenging the maintenance award should proceed.
Balanand Suryanarayan Jha
Sheela Balanand Jha
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
