A Family Court Appeal was already disposed of by order dated 6 October 2016. The Division Bench, due to lack of personal presence by both parties, removed the matter from the board for further intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 21_fca_188_2015 with cam322_2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.188 OF 2015
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2015
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.188 OF 2015
Balanand Suryanarayan Jha
...Appellant
Versus
Sheela Balanand Jha
...Respondent
...
Mr. Ravi Shinde i/b. Mr. Niranjan A. Mogre for the Appellant. Mr. Ratneshwar Jha for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : 29th NOVEMBER, 2016.
P. C. :
By order dated 6th October, 2016 the Appeal was disposed of. However, in the light of the willingness expressed by the AppellantHusband to take back the Respondent- wife, a Division Bench of this Court directed that the parties shall remain present in the Court so that the Court can talk to the parties. The learned counsel for the Respondent, on instructions of the Respondent, who is personally present, states that for various reasons, the Respondent is unable to
Megha
1/2
Megha 21_fca_188_2015 with cam322_2015.doc accept the offer of the Appellant. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant states that the Appellant is not personally present. In view of this statement, it is not necessary to keep the matter on board for the purpose of interviewing the parties.
removed from the board.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
2/2
Balanand Suryanarayan Jha
Sheela Balanand Jha
A.S. Oka
Anuja Prabhu Dassai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
