The Bombay High Court disposed of a Chamber Summons which had been issued solely for pretrial directions. With the proposal to take up the Testamentary Suit forthwith for framing issues, the summons was found to be unnecessary and was disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-CST55-13.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 55 OF 2013
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 67 OF 2013
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1550 OF 2012
...Plaintiff
Trevor Fernandes...Plaintiff
Versus
Tyrone Peter Fernandes…Defendant
Ms. Geeta Sonawane, i/b Mr. Denzil D'Mello, for the Applicant
Ms. Usha Gadagkar, i/b Diamondwala & Co., for the Defendant.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 21st June 2016
PC:-
1.The Chamber Summons is in compliance with Rule 404 of
the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules. The only prayer is for
pretrial directions. Since I propose to take up the Suit forthwith for
framing issues and other directions, the Chamber Summons will not
survive. It is disposed of in these terms with no order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
21st June 2016
Trevor Fernandes
Tyrone Peter Fernandes
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court