Disposed
Shyamala Raghunathan v. Vatsala Srinivasan
Bombay HCNMT/8/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
75-NMT8-11.DOC
¶2
ATUL
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 8 Of 2011
¶4
IN
¶5
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 49 OF 2003
¶6
IN
¶7
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 482 OF 2003
¶8
Shyamala Raghunathan
Versus
Vatsala Srinivasan
¶9
...Plaintiff
¶10
…Defendant
¶11
Mr. Farid Karachiwala, with Ms. Sneh Mehta, i/b Wadia Ghandy &
Co., for the Plaintiff.
¶12
Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy, for the Defendant.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shyamala Raghunathan
- respondent
Vatsala Srinivasan
Coram
AI extract
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court