Kewal Kartarnath Ahuja v. Meena Randhawa (Caveator)
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47-CST1-16.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1 OF 2016
IN
CAVEAT (L) NO. 412 OF 2015 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 577 OF 2015
Kewal Kartarnath Ahuja
Versus
Meena Radhawa
…Plaintiff
…Caveator
Mr. B.G. Saraf, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Vinod K. Sharma, for the Caveator.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:13th October 2016
PC:-
1. Heard Mr. Sharma for the Caveator in support of the Chamber Summons and Mr. Saraf appearing for the Petitioner vigorously showing cause.
2. For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay in filing the Caveat and Affidavit in Support is condoned.
Page 1 of 2
13th October 2016
47-CST1-16.DOC
3.Caveat and Affidavit in Support to be filed in the Registry on
or before 21st October 2016. If not filed by that date, the Caveat and
Affidavit in Support of the Applicant will then not be taken on
record. If filed within time, Petition to be renumbered as a Suit and
to be listed for framing issues on 16th November 2016.
4. The Chamber Summons is disposed of in these terms. No costs.
5. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
13th October 2016
Kewal Kartarnath Ahuja
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court