Mrs. Sulekha Surendra Avasare v. Mr. Radhakishore Madhusudan Wagh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-TP143-15.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 143 OF 2015
Radhakishore Madhusudan Wagh…Deceased
And
Mrs. Sulekha Surendra Avasare…Petitioner
Mr. Ameya Tamhane, for the Petitioner.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:10th October 2016
PC:-
1. The Petitioner’s Advocate has written instructions to withdraw the Petition. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Refund of court fee in accordance with the Rules.
3. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
10th October 2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Sulekha Surendra Avasare
Radhakishore Madhusudan Wagh
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court