Petitioner sought disposal of company petitions based on consent terms dated March 31, 2016. The Court recorded consent terms and disposed of the petitions and applications accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48 CP 656-14.doc
1/2
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINRAY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.656 OF 2014
Orafol Americas Inc Versus
... Petitioner
Reflexite Safety India Pvt. Ltd. … Respondents
ALONGWITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.931 OF 2015 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.656 OF 2014
| Modi Measurement Systems Pvt. Ltd. In the matter of : |
… | Applicant/ Intervener |
|---|---|---|
| Orafol Americas Inc. | … | Petitioner |
| Versus | ||
| Reflexite Safety India Pvt Ltd. | … | Respondent |
Mr. Mikhail Behl a/w Rishabh Jogani i/b DSK Legal for the Petitioner. Mr. Amit Shroff for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.
DATE : 20 APRIL 2016.
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel appearing for the parties tender Consent Terms dated 31 March 2016 duly signed by the parties through their authorised Representatives and also their respective Advocates. Learned Counsel seek disposal of the Company Petition and the Company Application in terms of the Consent Terms dated 31 March 2016. The Consent Terms are taken on record, marked 'X' for identification. Statements and
48 CP 656-14.doc
2/2
Chittewan
Undertakings contained therein, are accepted.
(S.C.GUPTE, J.)
Orafol Americas Inc.
Reflexite Safety India Pvt. Ltd.
S.C. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
