Application sought to expedite hearing of writ petition regarding 1999 dismissal. Applicant, a senior citizen above 65, had earlier complaints dismissed. Application allowed; petition expedited for hearing on 28 April 2016.
Petition expedited for hearing on 28 April 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw 909-2016.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 909 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5663 OF 2014
Dilip Kumar Yadav ...Petitioner / Applicant vs. M/s.Thacker Velvet Industries Pvt.Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr.Ratnesh Mishra for Applicant. Mr.Uday Shenoy I/b. H. Kumar Vaidyanathan for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
18 APRIL 2016
P.C. :
The civil application is for expediting the hearing of the writ petition. The dispute pertains to the year 1999 when the Petitioner was dismissed from service by the Respondent. The Petitioner's Complaint (ULP) No.262/2002 was dismissed by the Labour Court on 27 June 2006 and the order was confirmed in appeal by the Industrial Court on 26 September 2013. The Petitioner is a senior citizen over 65 years of age. The civil application is, accordingly, allowed and the petition is expedited, to come up for hearing on 28 April 2016.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Dilip Kumar Yadav
M/s.Thacker Velvet Industries Pvt.Ltd.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
