Petitioner sought disposal of Company Petition 547 of 2016 based on consent terms tendered by both parties, which were accepted and marked on record.
The petition was disposed of in terms of Consent Terms tendered and accepted by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 547-2016.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 547 OF 2016
Bijendra Singh Yadav …Petitioner vs. Dolphin Offshore Enterprises (India) Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr.Satendra Kumar for Petitioner. Ms.Subra Karmakar for Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
25 NOVEMBER 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the parties tender Consent Terms duly signed by the Respondent and also Advocates for the Petitioner and the Respondent. Learned Counsel seek disposal of the company petition in terms of the Consent Terms.
2 Learned Counsel for the Respondent undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of his client within a period of two weeks from today.
3 The Consent Terms are taken on record, marked “X” for identification. The statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. The petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. No order as to costs.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Bijendra Singh Yadav
Dolphin Offshore Enterprises (India) Ltd.
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
